Well, I think that's what I said ... applause and support for Arnie trying something different ...
I know how much people on this list like to use flash ... so I became a little more vocal for eschewing it. frank theriault wrote: > > With the Greatest of Respect, > > All John said is "try it". He didn't say that his way is the right way. > > Arnie trying all the options available to him can't be a bad thing, can it? > > cheers, > frank > > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist > fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer > > >From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: taxi in motion > >Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:09:30 -0800 > > > >Sure, John, that'll work, but it will yield a very generic photo. The idea > >of > >showing motion throughout the image, blurred subjects, is another approach, > >as is > >the "practice, practice, practice" approach. Different strokes for > >different > >folks ... Arnie gets kudos for trying something that's a little different > >for > >him. And damn it, flash changes the mood and the feel of the photograph. > > > >John Francis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > i specifically didnt want to use a flash - that was the whole point. > >it does > > > > take a little practice, maybe next time i'll be more successful. > > > > > > If you use the same slow shutter speed (1/4), and trailing-curtain-sync > >flash > > > (with -1 stop of flash exposure compensation) you'll still get all the > >trails > > > of lights, etc., you see in your original photograph, but the detail on > >the > > > car will look much better. Try it, if you've got a flash that will do > >that. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
