If I went back into commercial photography, I would go digital to do otherwise would be stupid and suicidal, as you well know. But, as a hobby, I have gone backwards prefering the old ways.
My post was not intended specifically to you but to the wider audiance of the list, you just provided a point to start from, Rob.
Landscapes? Why I don't know, Rob. I think that the proper way to do landscapes is to find a view. Then you set up the camera for the shot. They you wait until the light is right. Somehow, I do not see the need to shoot a thousand frames to get it. I mean 90% of the serious landscape photographers still use a view camera.
--
Rob Studdert wrote:
I think if you actually owned one you'd find it a little more capable that you expect, of course there are things that it can't do but hey all media has it's limitations, you've just got to learn what they are (which is difficult if you don't own one).
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
