Seems to me that DSLR's are making a serious inroad to the 645/66 area. A significant portion of the users of those systems shoot weddings and portraits. Digital works quite well there. Those who are shooting landscape/scenics might opt for a bigger format - either 67, 69 or 4X5.
I wouldn't be surprised to see 67 have a stronger presence than 645 a few years down the road. This is not just a Pentax issue. I predict that 67 and larger will do better than 645/66 in the film arena. The 645 that survives will be digital with better resolution than full frame 35mm. -- Best regards, Bruce Sunday, January 11, 2004, 2:34:07 AM, you wrote: J> ----- Original Message ----- J> From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> I'd call it a desperate attempt to perpetuate the 645 format. J> Hmm. J> You really think the 6x45 is a dying format as such? J> jostein
