On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:50:36 -0800, Shel wrote: >I already know how it does with the K85/1.8, the A*85/1.4, the >K105/2.8, the A100/2.8 macro, and the A200/4.0 macro ... and I still >like it. Knowing how Shel feels about sharp photos (he likes 'em really sharp), this sounds like a glowing recommendation for the 85/2. -- Happy Trails, Texdance http://members.fortunecity.com/texdance http://members1.clubphoto.com/john8202 - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? Flavio Minelli
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? Rfsindg
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? Rfsindg
- RE: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? Jens Bladt
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? John Mustarde
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? Paul . Stregevsky
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? John Mustarde
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.... William Robb
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the ... William Robb
- SV: What's the good or bad word on the ... John Mustarde
- SV: What's the good or bad word on the M-85... Jens Bladt
- Re: What's the good or bad word on the M-85 F2.0?? Paul . Stregevsky

