On 12/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:

>Why would anybody buy a medium format DSLR and put
>up with the extra weight and cost of the lenses and
>body if it didnt offer MORE resolution than the
>best 35mm full frame DSLRs?  In order to acheive that
>they are going to need a sensor substantially larger
>than 24x36 which is not economically feasable at this
>time.....

This isn't economically feasible either...

<http://www.meridiancamerastore.co.uk/MPG-Camerastore/KodakProback.html>

...to me. But people still buy it. Why would they buy something costing 2
or 3 times a 1Ds?

Because it's a part of a system they already have and use, and the cost
is relatively unimportant to solvent professionals. Tax deductable.





Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |      People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|      www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_____________________________
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk

Reply via email to