On 10 Dec 2003 at 14:16, Bill D. Casselberry wrote: > Yeah, but who in their right mind would care enough for > that level of detail in an "image" these days? Surely > noone would be willing to pay the extra costs incurred > over a 6mpxl "image" from a consumer DSLR. Exception may > be made for the sort of advertising agencies that Paul S. > shoots for in Detroit, but lower down the scale most anything > seems satisfactory - cheaper the better.
Yeah, sometimes I think it's a waste of time working with my associate in the Netherlands trying to further improve the output quality of my MF film scanner :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
