tom schrieb: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >> At least high-speed. In latest issue of , then at > > >> iso1600 Superia was much better, having > > >> significantly smaller grain than noise in both cameras. > > >> As we can see, no technology is perfect and so film has > > still some serious > > >> advantages over digital :-) > > > > > >I use the 1600 at some indoor horse venues.It actuall > > makes a half decent 8x10. I dont > > >think i'd go bigger though. > > > > Wait until next year's digital cameras. Or perhaps the year > > after. Not > > much longer, though. > > The writing is on the wall. > > Apply a little noise reduction to the ISO 1600 image and it won't look > much different from the ISO 400 image. > > I can distinctly remember making a few prints from 1600 speed files > and thinking, "Well, at least it's better than Fuji 1600!" > > tv
I can second this last comment! I combination with the easy white balance in tungsten light, this is one of the great new strengths my kit gained with the arival of the Sternenkiste. Pictures that weren't possible this way before! Still, in many cases I will continue using fim.... Thomas
