I don't mind reading about ithe *istD, although I don't plan to purchase one any time soon. Most of my photos these days are either for stock or for magazines. I need minimum 40 meg files for either. amd I like to have some room to crop if necessary. I'll continue scanning medium format and 35mm film for the forseeable future. When I can get a 10 megapixel camera for $500, I'll go digital. I figure that will happen in three years or less. And I'd bet on it. Any takers? Paul Stenquist
graywolf wrote: > > If you don't want to see posts about the istD just setup an email filter > to to delete any post with it in the subject or body. I think most of us > on this list consider ourself Pentax user's. It doesn't matter whether > you use a P&S, Digital, SLR, or DSLR Pentax camera. > > I wonder why it is that so many folks subscribe to this list and then > immediately want to change it to something else. Am I the only one who > finds that strange? > > I think Hans' post was more of a humorous woe-on-to-me comment anyway. > > Jim Apilado wrote: > > > I notice on dpreview.com that some *istD users are taking a vote to get a > > separate forum for the "D" instead of lumping everything under Pentax. > > Perhaps all the *istD users here should go to the other site, or else a > > digital PDML list could be developed exclusively for the new camera.
