I notice on dpreview.com that some *istD users are taking a vote to get a separate forum for the "D" instead of lumping everything under Pentax. Perhaps all the *istD users here should go to the other site, or else a digital PDML list could be developed exclusively for the new camera.
Jim A. > From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:24:27 +0200 > To: Hans Beumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: I haven't got *Ist D > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:22:17 -0400 > > Hi! > > Neither have I. But I also don't really want one. I am pretty much > happy with my ZX-L, several lenses, ME Super seemingly permanently in > repairs and one film a week that I try to shoot. > > When *ist D would cost $500 it may be worth thinking of, at least for > me. Meanwhile I am going to enjoy reading reports of William Robb, > Leon Altoff and other "digital brothers". Hopefully I would learn a > thing or two since they are bound to be discussing some aspects of > technique that would be applicable to simple-filmed people, such as > you and me. > > Don't hang your nose just yet (this is Russian saying, no offence > meant). > > Boris (the one _happily_ without) > > HB> I haven't got *Ist D. Haven't got the cash, or the nerves to tell my wife > I > HB> want one. And all PDML is talking about is *Ist D. Life sucks :-( > HB> Oh well, I'still have got my health... > > HB> Hans B. (the one without...) > > HB> mail to: > HB> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
