But if you want to use the 200mm with this converter, it's usually for long
distance shots, isn't it (that's at least what I should do). So there is a
lot of focussing at infinity. That should be okay. But its possibly harder
to get a great composition. That should be the price one pays.
Hans b.

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 17 september 2003 13:57
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Tele-converter, Pentax, Pentax or Vivitar, at wich price?




Fred wrote:
>
> > ...you'll have the equivalent of a f16 400mm with any if these
> > converters

> Well, a 2X TC used with a K 200/4 would give you 400mm at ~f/8~
> (but, of course, you would then usually stop down, if possible).
>
> Fred

That's one of the real problems with TCs, isn't it.
If you need the sharpness of your prime lens, which is usually best at
least 2 stops from full open, that will not be averted by the use of a
TC, but the 2X or 3X exposure increase forces you into a very dark, hard
to focus viewfinder situation.
If you're really lucky to possess a lens that performs well at close to
maximum aperture, make a note of that fact! "Okay to use with TC!"

keith whaley


Reply via email to