cheers, caveman
Pål Jensen wrote:
Caveman wrote:
Pål Jensen wrote:
I get 100% correct readout on every meter I own.
ROFL. This is quite a bold statement. Can you support it with some facts, like the method you used to check your meters, and the results that you got by following that method ?
REPLY:
Perhaps stating obvious is a bold statement in your universe. Perhaps mine was an unecessary statement, but bold? Any meter not faulty give 100% correct readout. As long as the meter is consistent, which it should be unless it is faulty, it always give 100% readout for whetever it is calibrated for. It doesn't really matter how it is calibrated either as long as the photographer knows it.
Pål
