Your comments make some sense for ups Pentax users who can use just about any lens Pentax ever made. But, for those other brands? However, I would venture if you make your living with your camera you won''t be using elderly equipment, you could not afford to. --Tom "Provencher, Paul M." wrote: > The mechanical construction makes for a lens that will certainly not last as > long. "Pro" zooms will perhaps have a much longer life than non-"Pro" > zooms, but both will not live as long as a "Pro" prime. This is a practical > consideration that will not affect image quality (initially) and so it is > left to the photographer to decide the importance of this. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: A... Alan Chan
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: A... Rob Studdert
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (W... William Robb
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppn... John Francis
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppn... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on cr... William Robb
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on cr... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re[2]: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on cro... Bob Walkden
- RE: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: A... Provencher, Paul M.
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (W... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppn... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: A... William Robb
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: A... Todd Stanley
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: A... Paul . Stregevsky
- Re: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: A... Provencher, Paul M.

