On 6 Mar 2001, at 9:41, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:

> Bill, I find it interesting that you have again and again
> disparaged the use of zooms and cropping in this never ending
> thread (renamed several times), and that your gallery entry this
> month is a highly cropped zoom lens photo.
> How do you reconcile this?

Hi Tom,

I will take a gamble on this ( tell me how wrong I am Bill ), I suspect Bill is 
referring to considered composition not simply grab shots (like Bill's 
sucessful PUG entry to which you refer)? For many PJs the only image that 
matters is one that has the main subject smack in the middle of the frame 
and covering most of it (=happy editor). This maybe one of the differences in 
perspective that seems to cause irritation between the 
PJ/portrait/street/macro/scenery shooters? 

All have differing agendas. In my style of shooting zoom capability would 
rarely be advantageous whereas a for PJ whose job depends on frame filling 
in-your-face shots a zoom capability might be mandatory (as may IS)?

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to