He is claiming an ability oggetting a perfect exposure within 1/3 stop, not is his terms , but objectively. JCO
> -----Original Message----- > From: whickersworld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Exposure (WAS: Re: OK Survey time) > > > Caveman wrote: > > > >Pål Jensen wrote: > > >> A perfect exposure is what I define as a perfect > exposure. > >> I want that exposure within 1/3 of a stop so that I can > get > >> what I define as perfect exposure every time. . > > Tadaa-badaa-da-daa. Twilight Zone. We're discussing a > Something that > we're not defining what it is. > > > > Hi Caveman, > > Pål is right here. Choose 3 expert photographers and ask > them to shoot the same scene in the same lighting. There > will be three "perfect" exposures, probably all different. > > There is no such thing as a *unique* perfect exposure. It's > not objective, it's subjective. The only definition of > perfect is in the mind of a photographer, and his/her > definition of "perfect" will only rarely exactly agree with > that of another photographer. > > Best regards, > > John > > > > > >
