The only way you can make this case is to assume that a camera that costs between
$1000.00 and $2000.00 is an entry level product. A Pentax 67 at B&H goes for a little
more than $2000.00 and a Pentax 645N II is a little less than $1900.00 the next most expensive
Film camera sold by Pentax is the MZ-S which sells for $800.00. These cameras
are hardly entry level. Neither is the *ist D. The class of cameras it is in,
(digital SRLs based on 35mm bodies), is used mainly by professionals. I must
therefor conclude it is not an entry level product and draw my conclusions from
that.


At 02:18 PM 6/9/03 +0200, you wrote:
Rüdiger wrote:

> I do not believe that either. I have the impression, that a lot people on
> the list
> do not see what just happed at Pentax. Pentax means it can maximise
> the selling with incompatiblity. So if not only the MZ-60, *ist, *istD (and
> the
> two comming *ists next year) will not need the aperture ring, all new lense
> will not have it anymore.

This is pure speculation without data points. The limitations is so far only on entry level products.

Pål

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx



Reply via email to