Rüdiger wrote: > I do not believe that either. I have the impression, that a lot people on > the list > do not see what just happed at Pentax. Pentax means it can maximise > the selling with incompatiblity. So if not only the MZ-60, *ist, *istD (and > the > two comming *ists next year) will not need the aperture ring, all new lense > will not have it anymore.
This is pure speculation without data points. The limitations is so far only on entry level products. Pål
