Considering his/her lack of experience and equipment, and budget, he/she might scan it, then enlarge it for the web. At 72 ppi screen resolution the resulting size won't be a problem, though I don't know how well it will scan.
Maris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can anyone help this customer: > > <<Hi, > > I have been on the internet for hours and I have no hair left!! I > want to phoograph diamonds for a web site. They need to appear on the > site abot 10 times real size. I bought a 3+ filter but this was a > waste of time and money. I got myself a camera book (I am a photo > novice) and it would appear the only way I > am going to get quality macro images is with a macro lense. I have a > Pentax > MZ30 and can not afford anything like £500 for a new Pentax Macro > Lens. Being a novice the auto features of any lense are important. > From the book I read. Taking Macro images of a diamond will require > maximum depth of field so I need an apeture priority compatible lens > (does this make sense?). > > Any help you can give would be wonderful and restore my faith in the > internet. > > Thanks > > Hayley>> > > Post your replies here and I will forward to her (?). Since I know > nothing > about file sizes for the web. > > Kind regards > > Peter > > CAMERA DIRECT > 8 DORSET STREET > BRIGHTON > EAST SUSSEX > BN2 1WA > UK > http://www.camera-direct.com > TEL 44 1273 681129 > FAX 44 1273 681135
