gfen wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Nick Zentena wrote: > > It appeared to be fully > developed much quicker than that, which is actually why I went from their > recommended 1:9 to 1:19, to sort of help draw that time out.
Don't change the developer mix or the development time. Change the exposure time. > > > From glancing at some of the other responses. For filters you > > might be able to put the bulb in some sort of tin can and the filter > > in front of that. You don't have to go through all that. All you have to do is place a gel filter on top of your neg and paper. You can buy a 6x6 set of gel filters at any good camera store. > > Oh, understood. Now, my concepts of paper grades is limited, but where on > the scale would unfiltered MG paper fall in? > Unfiltered MG paper is somewhere around 0 or -1. It's very low contrast and will produce muddy prints with normal negatives. Paul Stenquist
