In a message dated 3/2/2001 8:48:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << This means that even if a Canon IS lens is damned good, it would have been even better without the IS. >> Canon "L" lenses are damn good in their own right. Canon ultra "L" lenses, (300mm and up) ~ALL~ now have IS, which makes your statement a little self serving. If you are near or in a large city, go to a major camera strore, let them hold your plastic and take an IS lens for a spin. You'll take back everything you said. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization Pentax Clover
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization Mike Johnston
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization SudaMafud
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization Carlos Royo
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization Pentax Clover
- RE: Pentax and Image Stabilization Frits J. W�thrich
- RE: Pentax and Image Stabilization Cyril MARION
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilizati... Pentax Clover
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization SudaMafud
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization SudaMafud
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization David A. Mann
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization Gianfranco Irlanda
- RE: Pentax and Image Stabilization Frits J. W�thrich
- Re: Pentax and Image Stabilization Pentax Clover

