You are right, Bruce And it is more important to take more pictures and think during shooting than only reading test and specs. Cheers, Alek PS How about you Nikkors?Do you prefer them over Pentax or vice versa?Alek
Użytkownik Bruce Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >If someone would like to lend me a MZ-S for 6 months I would be glad to >compare it to a F100. My comments pertained to specific model cameras, >because that it what I have experience with. Now, I happen to have D and >non D lenses. Monitor preflash and multisegment TTL metering is still >done with non D lenses. I, and a number of people, have a hard time >telling if D lenses make any real difference. >People get so absorbed with manufacturer spec/feature/number sheets that >they don't realize that how well implemented something is is more >important than techno-market-speak. "My P-TTL beats your E-TTL, because >its a higher letter in the alphabet!" >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Hi, >>But you compare F100 with MZ5 which uses distant information but has not advanced >flash metering. You should compare F100 with MZS. And it must be truth with distant >information since when Pentax introduced P-TTL they have not changed anything in >lenses!!It proves that it should be similar to Nikon metering.So one can use FA >lenses having P-TTL unlike Nikon users who have to buy "D" lens and Minolta ones who >have to buy "G" lens. >>Alek >> >> > ***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** Chcesz oszczędzić na kosztach obsługi bankowej ? mBIZNES - konto dla firm http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbiznes
