Hi, But you compare F100 with MZ5 which uses distant information but has not advanced flash metering. You should compare F100 with MZS. And it must be truth with distant information since when Pentax introduced P-TTL they have not changed anything in lenses!!It proves that it should be similar to Nikon metering.So one can use FA lenses having P-TTL unlike Nikon users who have to buy "D" lens and Minolta ones who have to buy "G" lens. Alek Użytkownik Bruce Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >The 3D primarily has to do with the distance from the camera to the >subject for flash metering. While distance information has been >available from Pentax lenses, it wasn't used for exposure calculation >until some of the newer cameras came out. I don't think that there is >any difference in the percentage of properly exposed, ambient light >shots of either system, but the Nikon flash is better. (Based on years >with a ZX-5 and F100) > >BR > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Is it the same matrix metering system as on the MZ-5n? At least the >>symbol is the same and I'm very satisfied with the MZ-5n's metering >>performance. BTW - can anybody tell me what is so special about Nikon's >>"3D" matrix metering? Is there really a notable difference to Pentax's >>system? >> >>Cheers, Heiko >> >> >> >
***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** Chcesz oszczędzić na kosztach obsługi bankowej ? mBIZNES - konto dla firm http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbiznes
