Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# IESG review of draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-14

CC @MikeBishop

## Comments

### Section 2, paragraph 0

Thank you for this thorough Terminology section.

### Section 4.1, paragraph 1

This is the first use of the term "O flag" for the Strict-Path flag.
Consider using one name consistently throughout the document, or connecting the
terms more explicitly if you must retain both for consistency with existing
documents.

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Typos

#### Section 3.3, paragraph 1
```
-    The PATH-MODIFICATION TLV is optional.  If the TLV is included in
+    The PATH-MODIFICATION TLV is optional.  If the TLV is included in the
+                                                                     ++++
```

#### Section 3.3, paragraph 1
```
-    processed, subsequent instances MUST be ignored.
-             ^
+    processed; subsequent instances MUST be ignored.
+             ^
```

#### Section 4.1, paragraph 4
```
-    The flag is applicable only for stateful messages.  Existing O flag
-                                                        ^
+    The flag is applicable only for stateful messages.  The existing O flag
+                                                        ^^^^^
```



_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to