Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-23: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Many abbreviated terms in the Introduction aren't defined until Section 2. (PCC, SR-TE, LSPs, etc.) Consider expanding these on first use. Further, several of the abbreviations expanded in Section 2 don't have references to the RFCs where the terms are specified. This makes it difficult to explore further. For example, PCC is defined in RFC5440 which is not referenced by this document until Section 6. Compare this to the Terminology section of RFC8231, which provides explicit sources for each term. Throughout 3.x, should the names of these elements have "The" or "A" before them? Also, s/consist/consists/. The sentence in the Acknowledgement lacks a subject. Who would like to thank these people? _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
