Hi and thank you all, I’ll submit a -00 WG draft and address all comments in future revisions
Best regards, [Logo]<https://ribboncommunications.com/> Marina Fizgeer Sr. Manager, Systems Architecture | Ribbon M +972.544860016 Petah Tikva, Israel [Banner]<https://ribboncommunications.com/?_gl=1*6qlbuc*_gcl_au*MjA3NzE5OTk5NC4xNzI4NDE0NDY4*_ga*NTIxNzg1MDgxLjE3Mjg0MTQ0NjM.*_ga_VCEZ9Q3S3Y*MTcyODQ1MjEzMC4yLjEuMTcyODQ1MjE4OS4xLjAuMTA4NjExNTU4> From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 20:15 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-paramet...@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: WG Adoption of draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters-03 Hi WG, We have received a few more responses since the email below. While there is support to adopt this work, the chairs also acknowledge that it is not unanimous. A reminder that adoption does not imply the document is ready for publication; rather, it signifies that the work falls within the scope of the WG and has some level of support for further development. Please note that adoption does not guarantee that the I-D will be published as an RFC. The authors are expected to submit a -00 WG draft and address all comments in future revisions as part of the working group process. Those who provided feedback are encouraged to suggest specific text to the authors. Additionally, the authors are specifically requested to clarify the motivation for this work and justify why a PCEP extension is necessary. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:12 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote: Hi WG, We have not received sufficient feedback on the I-D, and at this point, it appears there isn’t enough support. However, considering the period of the year, the chairs have decided to extend the poll by one week. If you believe the I-D should be adopted, now is the time to share your opinion. If you do not support it, please provide your reasons. Authors are also requested to respond to the messages received so far. The chairs will review the feedback and make a final decision on Friday, 31st January. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 4:37 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote: Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters-03 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 20th Jan 2025. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien Disclaimer This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
