Hi, I have reviewed the latest version of this draft.I think it is ready to move forward. The structure of the document and the textual descriptions are both clear and well-organized.
Here are some minor comments: The documents use many terms such as PCE, PCC, and LSP, which are all quite standardized. The full names and references have been added, but there are still some terms that are not noted.For example, PCRpt, PCUpd, and PCInitiate. I suggest checking these terms and adding their full names and references.It would be best to include a separate section titled "Terminology," similar to Chapter 2 "Terminology" in RFC5440 (Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)). B.R. Weiqiang From: Dhruv Dhody Date: 2025-01-24 20:38 To: pce CC: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-state-sync Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-11 Hi WG, This email marks the start of a 3-week working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-11, taking into account the Chinese New Year holiday during this period. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-state-sync/ Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. The WG LC will end on Friday 14th Feb 2025. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
