John, Thanks for the review. Please see inline (prefixed VPB).
Regards, -Pavan (on behalf of the authors) On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 4:42 AM John Scudder <jgs= 40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Thanks for this clear and easy to review document. Thanks also to Andrew > for the exemplary and helpful shepherd writeup. I have only a couple > extremely minor notes, so I am going to skip my usual practice of marking > up the document. > > 1. I think every instance of the word “new” in the document could be > deleted without harm. This is entirely a matter of taste so do as you > prefer. My preference for leaving “new” out is that years from now, when > the document is still being referenced, they won’t be new any longer. > [VPB] We will remove all occurrences of "new" in the next revision (to be submitted soon). > > 2. "When LSPs that belong to the same TE tunnel are within the same Path > Protection Association Group [RFC8745], they are all expected to be > attached with the same color.” I found the use of “be attached with” to be > non-idiomatic and somewhat confusing. Do you mean, "When LSPs that belong > to the same TE tunnel are within the same Path Protection Association Group > [RFC8745], they are all expected to have the same color attached to them”? > [VPB] Yes, that is what it means. We'll make the suggested edit in the next revision. > > Thanks, > > —John > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
