On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 2:03 AM Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> Thanks Julien. > > This is good and speedy progress (proof, if any were needed , that the > IETF does not need to take multiple years to make simple changes). > > As a co-author, I am content with the text and think it is ready to move > forward. > > What Adrian said.... > Cheers, > Adrian > > PS Not aware of any pertinent IPR > +1 I am also unaware of any IPR relevant to this I-D. Thanks! Dhruv (co-author) > > > On 06/09/2024 13:23 BST julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Since we have consensus, let's move forward with this simple fix to [1], > as agreed with the IESG. This message starts a 2-week WG last call for > draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 [2]. Please share your support or comments > on the PCE mailing list by Friday September 20. > > Thank you, > > Julien > > > [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C519 > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
