Hi WG, The early allocation is completed. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml
Thanks! Dhruv On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:25 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > We did not receive any objections and thus we will be going ahead with the > early allocation. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 11:21 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > >> Hi WG, >> >> We have received a request from the authors >> of draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy for an early code point allocation for >> the codepoints listed in - >> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.1 >> (TBD1) >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.2-4 >> (TBD2) >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.3 >> (TBD3-5) >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.4 >> (TBD6) >> >> RFC 7120 requires one to meet the following criteria to proceed: >> >> b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to >> handling the protocol entities defined by the code points >> (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described >> in an Internet-Draft. >> >> c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if >> there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later >> specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. >> >> According to the chairs’ review, the RFC 7120 criteria are met; if you >> disagree and believe that the draft does not meet these criteria or believe >> that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please >> send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why by August 19th. >> >> Thanks! >> Dhruv & Julien >> >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
