Hi WG, We did not receive any objections and thus we will be going ahead with the early allocation.
Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 11:21 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > We have received a request from the authors > of draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy for an early code point allocation for > the codepoints listed in - > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.1 > (TBD1) > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.2-4 > (TBD2) > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.3 > (TBD3-5) > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.4 > (TBD6) > > RFC 7120 requires one to meet the following criteria to proceed: > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > According to the chairs’ review, the RFC 7120 criteria are met; if you > disagree and believe that the draft does not meet these criteria or believe > that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please > send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why by August 19th. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
