Hi WG, I addressed all comments that I received so far (let me know if I missed anything).
I copied some text from [I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy] into Section 5.3, to avoid making a normative reference to that draft. So we should probably review it again in more detail. Also, we need to double check Section 6.5 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13#section-6.5), to make sure it's a good idea to create the new registry under Segment Routing instead of under PCEP. Thanks, Mike. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Tuesday, January 16th, 2024 at 7:48 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > A new version of Internet-Draft > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13.txt has been successfully > submitted by Mike Koldychev and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp > Revision: 13 > Title: PCEP Extensions for SR Policy Candidate Paths > Date: 2024-01-16 > Group: pce > Pages: 23 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/ > HTMLized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp > Diff: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13 > > Abstract: > > A Segment Routing (SR) Policy is a non-empty set of SR Candidate > Paths, which share the same <headend, color, endpoint> tuple. SR > > Policy is modeled in PCEP as an Association of one or more SR > Candidate Paths. PCEP extensions are defined to signal additional > attributes of an SR Policy. The mechanism is applicable to all SR > forwarding planes (MPLS, SRv6, etc.). > > > > The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
