I support publication. I have reviewed v12 and have a few minor comments.
At the end of the abstract section you could say forwarding planes of SR instead of dataplane. As the data planes of SR would be MPLS and IPv6. Old The mechanism is applicable to all data planes of SR (MPLS, SRv6, etc.). New The mechanism is applicable to SR forwarding planes of SR (SR-MPLS SRv6, etc.). My understanding is that as RFC 8664 is the base PCEP extension for SR and this draft is an add on to the base SR PCEP extension to provide the CP support. My thoughts was a more appropriate name for the draft as "PCEP extension for SR Policy Candidate paths" or "PCEP SR Extension for Candidate paths" Kind Regards <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347* On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 5:29 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/ > > > Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed > to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If > you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and > it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and > nits are most welcome. > > The WG LC will end on Monday 22nd January 2024. > > A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the > last-call/adoption. > > Thanks, > Dhruv & Julien > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
