Yes it does. -----Original Message----- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Jamie Pauls Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 2:34 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71
Doesn't the dm-520 have a built-in stereo mic? ----- Original Message ----- From: "tim" <isfe...@gmail.com> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 3:33 PM Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71 > hi all! am seriously debating between a ds71 and a dm520, only thing > stopping me from the dm520 is the not included stereo mike like that comes > with the ds71, also, is there any other recorders with 4 gig or grater > copasity, built in speech and a mike or 2 included with the product? > thanks for help! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lauren" <lotusris...@att.net> > To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 6:48 > Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71 > > >> Hi, >> >> Can someone please talk about the cost f these items? I am looking for a >> digital recorder that you can take anywhere, that has a good sound >> quality, but that is also affordable. I am on a budget. >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Lauren >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Tim Noonan" <t...@timnoonan.com.au> >> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 7:35 PM >> Subject: RE: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71 >> >> >>>I would guess, in the absence of no hard comparative data, that the >>>audio >>> recording quality of the Pocket is quite a bit better than is the >>> Olympus >>> DS-71, which I do have. >>> >>> I find the Olympus, across a range of external mics does have a degree >>> of >>> background hiss (preamp noise or circuit noise). This is the case when >>> set >>> to wave recording and manual mic input levels. >>> >>> Also, The Olympus doesn't actually have a line in, only a mic in port, >>> so I >>> am curious about line in recording quality, and whether you are using an >>> attenuation cable to reduce the line in signal to mic levels? >>> >>> That all said, I absolutely love my Olympus DS-71 in so many ways, and >>> for >>> so many reasons: its extraordinarily flexible and effective voice >>> recording >>> capabilities, battery life and replaceable batteries, and especially its >>> super compact size makes it a take everywhere audio device. >>> >>> Speaker monitoring of line in recordings, and audible recording level >>> feedback are features unique to the Plextalk recorders. >>> >>> Regards >>> Tim >>> >>> -----Original Message-----t >>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org >>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] >>> On Behalf Of G-Dog >>> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 10:20 AM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Digital recorders again. >>> >>> Agreed! >>> >>> accessability is a very important factor but it doesn't equate to >>> performance. >>> I use the olympus DS-71 which does an excellent job for both mike and >>> line >>> in recordings. >>> Yes, you can monitor through headphones. >>> I also like the fact that it uses AAA batteries that makes it easy to >>> swap >>> them out if needed. >>> >>> I hear the Edital R9 is also a nifty unit >>> >>> G-Doggy-dog! >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bruce Toews" <br...@ogts.net> >>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:01 PM >>> Subject: Re: Digital recorders again. >>> >>> >>> That statement should probably be qualified: It may well be the most >>> excellent recording device in its class on the market, I couldn't say >>> but have no reason to believe otherwise, but there are better recording >>> devices on the market. Sweeping statements are dangerous. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:56:11 -0500, "Sunshine" <sunsh...@abe.midco.net> >>> said: >>>> I totally agree with you Dean, the plextalk pocket is the most exclent >>>> recording device on the market these days. >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "dean martineau" <dea...@earthlink.net> >>>> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:36 PM >>>> Subject: RE: Digital recorders again. >>>> >>>> >>>> What I know is that the PlexTalk Pocket is totally accessible, nicely >>>> packaged, has both manual and automatic level control, and does a very >>>> nice >>>> job of recording from the line injack. I doubt any other digital >>>> recorder >>>> provides as much feedback, as this one is made for the blind. Of >>>> course, >>>> it >>>> may (or may not, I don't know) cost more than others of similar >>>> quality, >>>> but >>>> there's no guesswork involved. It's nice to be able to monitor through >>>> the >>>> speaker when making a line-in recording. >>>> >>>> Dean >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org >>>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] >>>> On Behalf Of Tim Crawford >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:27 AM >>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>>> Subject: Digital recorders again. >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Just wondering, which one of the flash memory based recorders recently >>>> discussed here, would be most suitable for making high quality >>>> recordings >>>> from an external source via line-in? e.g. a satellite receiver. >>>> >>>> I don't intend recording via microphone, so that particular aspect of >>>> performance is of limited interest. >>>> >>>> Any views much appreciated. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Tim. >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus >>>> signature >>>> database 4487 (20091007) __________ >>>> >>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. >>>> >>>> http://www.eset.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4627 (20091121) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4627 (20091121) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4733 (20091231) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4733 (20091231) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
