To all concerned,
I have sad news.
Richard passed on December 12, 2009 of a heart attack.
Some may know already, however, I'm sending this information to all of
Richards email contacts.
It was so sudden with no warning.
I know Richard receives many emails each day and I want to inform all those
who contacted him.
Sincerely,
Anthony and Teresa Costa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jed Barton" <j...@jedbarton.com>
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71
tell me about the dm520.
is it a multi track editer?
-----Original Message-----
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Robert Logue
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:43 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71
I found the software that comes with the dm-520 pretty accessible. A few
things are slightly trickey but for the most part it works fine with Jaws
11. I'm only having trouble with the sound editor. Not sure how to
select
regions with the keyboard.
The options dialog needs the Jaws cursor.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave McElroy WA6BEF" <d...@drakelroy.com>
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71
I can only speak for the DM520. Haven't actually tried the software cause
I've not needed it; Windows Explorer works just fine. But if I can find
it
I'll try it and get back to you.
-----Original Message-----
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Gary Schindler
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:27 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71
I don't have one yet to say if you can or can not.
----- Original Message -----
From: "tim" <isfe...@gmail.com>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71
another question, I here hte softer that you can get with the dm model
and
upgrade isn't accessible at all is this true?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Schindler" <garys5...@comcast.net>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 20:29
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus DS-71
I would go for the DM-520,
because you can split wave files and parcial erase them to! I think
they
will phase out the DS-71 soon anyway.
----- Original Message -----
From: "tim" <isfe...@gmail.com>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus
DS-71
so not sure what one to get the ds71 is more expensive, but not sure
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamie Pauls" <jamiepa...@sbcglobal.net>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 16:33
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus
DS-71
Doesn't the dm-520 have a built-in stereo mic?
----- Original Message -----
From: "tim" <isfe...@gmail.com>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus
DS-71
hi all! am seriously debating between a ds71 and a dm520, only thing
stopping me from the dm520 is the not included stereo mike like that
comes with the ds71, also, is there any other recorders with 4 gig
or
grater copasity, built in speech and a mike or 2 included with the
product? thanks for help!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lauren" <lotusris...@att.net>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 6:48
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus
DS-71
Hi,
Can someone please talk about the cost f these items? I am looking
for a digital recorder that you can take anywhere, that has a good
sound quality, but that is also affordable. I am on a budget.
Sincerely,
Lauren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Noonan" <t...@timnoonan.com.au>
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 7:35 PM
Subject: RE: Digital recorders again - Plextalk Pocket and Olympus
DS-71
I would guess, in the absence of no hard comparative data, that
the
audio
recording quality of the Pocket is quite a bit better than is the
Olympus
DS-71, which I do have.
I find the Olympus, across a range of external mics does have a
degree of
background hiss (preamp noise or circuit noise). This is the case
when set
to wave recording and manual mic input levels.
Also, The Olympus doesn't actually have a line in, only a mic in
port, so I
am curious about line in recording quality, and whether you are
using an
attenuation cable to reduce the line in signal to mic levels?
That all said, I absolutely love my Olympus DS-71 in so many ways,
and for
so many reasons: its extraordinarily flexible and effective voice
recording
capabilities, battery life and replaceable batteries, and
especially
its
super compact size makes it a take everywhere audio device.
Speaker monitoring of line in recordings, and audible recording
level
feedback are features unique to the Plextalk recorders.
Regards
Tim
-----Original Message-----t
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of G-Dog
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 10:20 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again.
Agreed!
accessability is a very important factor but it doesn't equate to
performance.
I use the olympus DS-71 which does an excellent job for both mike
and line
in recordings.
Yes, you can monitor through headphones.
I also like the fact that it uses AAA batteries that makes it easy
to swap
them out if needed.
I hear the Edital R9 is also a nifty unit
G-Doggy-dog!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Toews" <br...@ogts.net>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Digital recorders again.
That statement should probably be qualified: It may well be the
most
excellent recording device in its class on the market, I couldn't
say
but have no reason to believe otherwise, but there are better
recording
devices on the market. Sweeping statements are dangerous.
Bruce
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:56:11 -0500, "Sunshine"
<sunsh...@abe.midco.net>
said:
I totally agree with you Dean, the plextalk pocket is the most
exclent
recording device on the market these days.
----- Original Message -----
From: "dean martineau" <dea...@earthlink.net>
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Digital recorders again.
What I know is that the PlexTalk Pocket is totally accessible,
nicely
packaged, has both manual and automatic level control, and does a
very
nice
job of recording from the line injack. I doubt any other digital
recorder
provides as much feedback, as this one is made for the blind. Of
course,
it
may (or may not, I don't know) cost more than others of similar
quality,
but
there's no guesswork involved. It's nice to be able to monitor
through
the
speaker when making a line-in recording.
Dean
-----Original Message-----
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Tim Crawford
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:27 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Digital recorders again.
Hi all,
Just wondering, which one of the flash memory based recorders
recently
discussed here, would be most suitable for making high quality
recordings
from an external source via line-in? e.g. a satellite receiver.
I don't intend recording via microphone, so that particular
aspect
of
performance is of limited interest.
Any views much appreciated.
Cheers,
Tim.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature
database 4487 (20091007) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature
database 4627 (20091121) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature
database 4720 (20091227) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature
database 4720 (20091227) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4722 (20091228) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4722 (20091228) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
