only thing though is that foobar seems a bit clunky in the GUI and not sure
how to get around in the program especially in the 0.96 beta 4 release
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Claypool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: Why winamp?
right, but you can use winamp plugins with fuber, and it uses les memory
[stopped]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anders Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 6:29 PM
Subject: SV: Why winamp?
Hi!
Well the winamp forum is on a page that's using captcha.
Also it has not so many plugins and such.
So i think i will go for winamp.
/Anders.
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
För Steve Pattison
Skickat: den 10 november 2008 11:09
Till: PC Audio Discussion List
Ämne: Re: Why winamp?
Hi Anders,
Regarding Winamp the installation is extremely flexible so you can
install as many or as few features as you want and need so Winamp
doesn't have to take up a lot of space. I like Winamp because I like
experimenting with some of the DSP/Effect plug-ins available for Winamp.
I don't have Hal so I don't know how well the Winamp library works with
Hal. Another reason I like to use Winamp is because of the excellent
Window-Eyes scripts now available for Winamp. However if Foobar 2000
meets all of your needs you might like to keep using it. So you have a
lot of options.
Regards Steve.
From: Anders Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Actually i have been using foobar2000 for 4 years now.
However from the beginning it was a really neat and great player. Though
many functions i had in my first version of foobar2000 has been removed. For
example, you now have to create your own hotkeys for play stop etc. Now to
my question. Most people seems to use winamp and seems to be very satisfied
with it. But it seems to take up a lot of space though. Now in the latest
version of hal you can use winamp much more flexible
than
before.
The screenreader has got new map files and scripts.
So i am thinking to start using winamp again after 4 years. There is a
streamripper plugin also for winamp. But why should i use winamp? More than
what i've stated above. Can the library feature be used? Such as the
shoutcast radio functionality i had in older versions of
winamp.
Regards Steve
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows Live Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: steve1963
Jonathan Mosen List Founder
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To
unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathan Mosen List Founder
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathan Mosen List Founder
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathan Mosen List Founder
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
