Hi Anders, Regarding Winamp the installation is extremely flexible so you can install as many or as few features as you want and need so Winamp doesn't have to take up a lot of space. I like Winamp because I like experimenting with some of the DSP/Effect plug-ins available for Winamp. I don't have Hal so I don't know how well the Winamp library works with Hal. Another reason I like to use Winamp is because of the excellent Window-Eyes scripts now available for Winamp. However if Foobar 2000 meets all of your needs you might like to keep using it. So you have a lot of options.
Regards Steve. From: Anders Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org Actually i have been using foobar2000 for 4 years now. However from the beginning it was a really neat and great player. Though many functions i had in my first version of foobar2000 has been removed. For example, you now have to create your own hotkeys for play stop etc. Now to my question. Most people seems to use winamp and seems to be very satisfied with it. But it seems to take up a lot of space though. Now in the latest version of hal you can use winamp much more flexible than before. The screenreader has got new map files and scripts. So i am thinking to start using winamp again after 4 years. There is a streamripper plugin also for winamp. But why should i use winamp? More than what i've stated above. Can the library feature be used? Such as the shoutcast radio functionality i had in older versions of winamp. Regards Steve Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows Live Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: steve1963 Jonathan Mosen List Founder Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
