Lately when ripping CD's, I use something called vbr/abr!  The abr means 
average bit rate.  I think this is supposed to be better than vbr, because 
it tries to find the average bit rate for better quality!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Donald L. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: CBR or VBR


> Although I cannot prove it, my ears suggest that this is true in
> theory but not in reality.  There are some purists on this and
> other lists who think that because mp3 or ogg or wma as well as
> others represent a so called "lossy format," that using any such
> format makes it a substandard recording.  I suspect that if you
> performed an a-b comparison, many of them would guess
> incorrectly.
>
> But back to your original question, VBR may produce slightly
> smaller file sizes if you record at extremely high bit rates; but
> I will guarantee that this is not true when you record at lower
> bit rates for things like books.
>
> Don Roberts
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 1:23 PM
> Subject: Re: CBR or VBR
>
>
> But I've heard that with vbr, you do get a smaller file, but the
> nature of
> variable bit rates is that you are supposed to get higher
> quality, despite
> the smaller size!
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:18 PM
> Subject: Re: CBR or VBR
>
>
>> hi
>> vbr makes a smaller file. you set limits as to how much data it
>> will
>> encode,
>> say between 96 and 192 kbps. the encoder will analyze the music
>> and do
>> what
>> it thinks is good quality encoding between those specified
>> limits. the
>> advantage of that is you get a smaller file. the advantage of
>> cbr is that
>> the data is all the same bitrate, which makes sure it's all the
>> same
>> quality. vbr in my experience, the few times i've used it
>> sounds worse
>> than
>> cbr, but this could be just me.
>>
>>
>> Brandon Hicks
>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Skype: callto://reyuth
>> msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>> http://www.pc-audio.org
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other
>> lists we
>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> http://www.pc-audio.org
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other
> lists we offer, visit us on the web at
> http://www.MosenExplosion.com
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1599 (20060614) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> http://www.pc-audio.org
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
> 



_______________________________________________
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com

Reply via email to