On 07.11.2017 17:55, Brian C. Lane wrote:> At first glance (I haven't tried this patch set yet) this looks pretty > good to me, except: > > 1. I think force is too generic, it implies that it will allow all > dangerous actions in all the commands. I think it should be named > something more limiting. --ignore-busy, or --force-shrink, or ? > > 2. This should include tests.
Thanks for the feedback! Makes sense and sounds doable. My vote is for --ignore-busy then. Any other comments?
