https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2423975
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> --- Ooh, I'm excited to see something using declarative builds! Spec review: > VCS: git:%{giturl}.git Uhh, what is this? We have no specification for the VCS tag, so how is something supposed to figure this out? (Also, wouldn't git+https make sense as the protocol?) Review notes: * Package output follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines * Package builds and installs * Some directory ownership issues (dynamic subpackage definitions aren't pulling in Python as a runtime dep?) - From fedora-review: Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.14, /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages * Package licensing seems to be correct and valid I'm not sure what we should do about the directory ownership issue...? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2423975 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202423975%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
