https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394931



--- Comment #36 from Benson Muite <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez from comment #33)
> Reply:
> 
> d) The texinfo option hasn't been released yet. I can pull the patch,
> however, I'm already generating the doxygen api docs and are in HTML. The
> doc package can't avoid HTML at this point. Does it make sense to remove the
> existing handbook in HTML?

No, leave as is.

> g) How would this help during the build? 

Is this a better source of randomness?

> i) --with-boost would add an additional runtime dependency on this package.
> Do you see a lot of value to it? [1]
> 
>    It enables using some Boost libraries. In particular Boost.Filesystem is
> used for a few operations (but on most platforms, a
>    native API equivalent is available), and Boost.Asio is used to provide a
> few extra TLS related command line utilities.
>    
> I could add it if someone that uses the cli significantly asks for that.
>

Ok.

> 
> Good points and catches. Thank you for the feedback.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394931

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202394931%23c36

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to