No there's a separate interface for cluster communication. I don't have fencing configured in the setup.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > On 20 Aug 2014, at 11:45 pm, Arjun Pandey <apandepub...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I have a 2 Node(Active-Passive) mode cluster on CentOS 6.4 >> After setting up the cluster things work fine. >> >> There are 4 resources (2 virtual IP's and my application (master-slave ) >> mode). >> Additionally i have a constraint that virtual IP's are colocated with >> the master. >> >> If i bring the interface down using ifconfig eth1 down , migration of >> virtual IP happens and the slave instance gets promoted. > > Is this the same interface that the cluster communicates on? > Have you got fencing configured? > >> However the >> address with the previous is not cleaned up. If the interface is >> again brought up, i now see the virtual IP associated with interfaces >> on both the nodes. Should IP be flushed from interface via migration >> ? >> >> Regards >> Arjun >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
