On 20 Aug 2014, at 11:45 pm, Arjun Pandey <apandepub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi > > I have a 2 Node(Active-Passive) mode cluster on CentOS 6.4 > After setting up the cluster things work fine. > > There are 4 resources (2 virtual IP's and my application (master-slave ) > mode). > Additionally i have a constraint that virtual IP's are colocated with > the master. > > If i bring the interface down using ifconfig eth1 down , migration of > virtual IP happens and the slave instance gets promoted. Is this the same interface that the cluster communicates on? Have you got fencing configured? > However the > address with the previous is not cleaned up. If the interface is > again brought up, i now see the virtual IP associated with interfaces > on both the nodes. Should IP be flushed from interface via migration > ? > > Regards > Arjun > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
