On 23/05/2013, at 9:47 PM, Brian J. Murrell <br...@interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:
> On 13-05-22 07:05 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> Also, 1.1.8-7 was not tested with the plugin _at_all_ (and neither will >> future RHEL builds). > > Was 1.1.7-* in EL 6.3 tested with the plugin? No. Which is why I didn't notice logging was broken. > Is staying with most > recent EL 6.3 pacemaker-1.1.7 release really the more stable option for > people not able to re-tool their clusters to use CMAN at this point in time? That would not be my recommendation. If you really want to keep using the plugin, use the clusterlabs.org rpms. At least they get bug fixes when the community finds an issue. For example, 1.1.9 already had a fix for the fencing issue (even before it was discovered in RHEL). > > When it's RHEL 7 upgrade time, a re-tooling of the HA framework can be > put on the table, but such a thing cannot be be considered during a > stable release series, unfortunately. Up to you. Really its just a matter of configuring corosync a different way. The Pacemaker parts stay the same. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
