On 13-05-22 07:05 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>  
> Also, 1.1.8-7 was not tested with the plugin _at_all_ (and neither will 
> future RHEL builds).

Was 1.1.7-* in EL 6.3 tested with the plugin?  Is staying with most
recent EL 6.3 pacemaker-1.1.7 release really the more stable option for
people not able to re-tool their clusters to use CMAN at this point in time?

When it's RHEL 7 upgrade time, a re-tooling of the HA framework can be
put on the table, but such a thing cannot be be considered during a
stable release series, unfortunately.

Thanks,
b.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to