----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yan Gao" <y...@suse.com>
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:23:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Enable remote monitoring
> 
> Hi,
> Here's the latest code:
> https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker/commit/4d58026c2171c42385c85162a0656c44b37fa7e8
> 
> 
> Now:
> - container-type:
>   * black - ordering, colocating
>   * white - ordering
>   Both them are not probed so far.

I think for the sake of this implementation we should ignore the whitebox use 
case for now.  There are aspects of the whitebox use case that I'm just not 
sure about yet, and I don't want to hold you all up trying to define that. I 
don't mind re-approaching this container concept and expanding it to the 
whitebox use case later on building with what you have here.  I'm in favor of 
removing the "container-type" letting the blackbox use case be the default for 
now, and I'll go in and do our whitebox bits later.  It feels like we are at 
least headed in the right direction with all of this now.

> 
> - on-fail defaults "restart-container" for most actions,
>
>   except for stop op (Not sure what it means if a stop fails. A
>   nagios
> daemon cannot be terminated? Should it always return success?) ,

A nagios "stop" action should always return success.  The nagio's agent doesn't 
even need a stop function, the lrmd can know to treat  a "stop" as a (no-op for 
stop) + (cancel all recurring actions).  In this case if the nagios agent 
doesn't stop successfully,  it is because of an lrmd failure which should 
result in a fencing action i'd imagine.

> still
> defaults to "fence" for it for now.
> 
> - Failures of resources count against container's
> migration-threshold.

What happens if someone wants to clear the container's failcount? Do we need to 
add some logic to go in and clear all the child resource's failures as well to 
make this happen correctly?

-- Vossel

> - Also support grouping container with its resources.
> 
> Please help take a look, and correct me if I missed anything after
> the
> tons of discussions. :-)
> 
> Regards,
>   Gao,Yan
> --
> Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com>
> Software Engineer
> China Server Team, SUSE.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to