On 2012-12-07T10:38:44, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> > Uhm. Would "container" imply ordering + colocation, or would we still
> > need them grouped (resource_set'ed, whatever)?
> Ordering: absolutely
> Colocation is less clear, I think the default is no but David has suggested
> an additional meta attribute to turn it on.
blackbox - colocated on the node where the container is running
- not probed
whitebox - colocated on the virtual node provided by the container
- probed only there
? Obviously, so far, we'd only implemented the first kind, since we
don't yet have the second, but it would go there.
> > My, design is hard. ;-)
> I like where we got to in the end though, it should handle both white
> and black box monitoring nicely. Being a PITA can have its benefits.
True. So is being persistent ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
