Andrew Beekhof <andrew@...> writes: > I believe things are much improved with more recent releases. > Hence the recommendation of 1.4.x Yes, we switched to corosync and the problem doesn't occur again! All tests are passed now.
>>But really: you need to fix your "unsteady" network, >>and probably should implement stonith. If everything works fine we wouldn't need LinuxHA :-). The weak point was the recovery after such circumstances. We support a couple of clusters not just one, that's the reason for our concerns. Thank you very much for explaining and clarifying this issue. Kind regards Roman _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
