Andrew Beekhof <andrew@...> writes: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Roman Sidler > <roman.sidler@...> wrote:
> The CCM (part of heartbeat) is known not to be particularly awesome in > such scenarios and it appears to be the case again here: > > Mar 16 01:35:31 oan1 crmd: [7601]: info: ccm_event_detail: NEW MEMBERSHIP: > trans=15, nodes=1, new=0, lost=0 n_idx=0, new_idx=1, old_idx=3 > > As far as pacemaker knows, its still all alone. > > Perhaps give corosync 1.4.x a go instead of heartbeat? > Hi Andrew Thank you for pointing this out. Our products/tools are currently based on heartbeat. But I'm going to try corosync.. Roman _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
