Hi, Yan
I read a cord of pengine.
By all appearance, as for the resource becoming "unmanaged failed", an
allotment does not seem to be performed.
Is the recognition that an allotment is not performed as for the
"unmanaged failed" resource that failed in stop right?
Does it mean that capacity of the node is not used if not assigned?
Regards,
Yuusuke
(2011/07/26 16:12), Yuusuke IIDA wrote:
Hi, Yan
Hi, Andrew
I used the function of placement-strategy and found movement to be worried
about.
There is node "act3" which the resource that became the unmanaged state starts.
The resource that started then in node "act1" broke down and moved.
I hoped that this inoperative resource moved to node "sby1", but it was not
carried out.
Is the movement that a resource with other capacity moves in the node that the
resource of the unmanaged state meets capacity right as specifications?
I want you to revise it to decide placement in consideration of the capacity of
the unmanaged resource.
I attach crm_report when a problem happened.
Best Regards,
Yuusuke
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
--
----------------------------------------
METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD
Yuusuke Iida
Mail: iiday...@intellilink.co.jp
----------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
