2011/9/8 Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com>: > On 09/08/2011 01:18 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> Sorry, but there's just no way anything like this is going to be >> accepted in fedora, rhel or upstream. >> If the packaging of cluster-glue-libs is too granular, the correct >> approach is to create additional subpackages - not to copy half of the >> project into pacemaker. > > OK thanks Andrew. > Yes I agree that's a better approach. > At least the proof of concept SRPM helps define > where this split might be made.
At a guess, you probably want libplumb in a package by itself. If there are one or two other functions we can consider copying just those. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
