On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Florian Haas <f.g.h...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 09/06/11 20:34, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> Currently anything that links with pacemaker-libs also >> needs to have access to all the cluster-glue-libs. >> In a bid to reduce this I've created a subset of clplumbing >> as a "libtool convenience library" within pacemaker. >> I've just done this as a patch and extra source archive >> in the rpm for the moment. > > Any plans to set up a branch in a GitHub repo for this? That would > facilitate testing and would also make it easier for Andrew to pull, I > imagine.
Agreed. Proposing patches in the form of an SRPM is an unusual approach. Not sure its worth too much effort though, we'll likely be moving IPC and logging over to https://github.com/asalkeld/libqb in the near future (once a shipping version corosync uses it too). Not sure there is much left for cluster-glue to do after that. > > Cheers, > Florian > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
